From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: smtp crap Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:09:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83k48cxj85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8739f4kzp3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ipo0p1bc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <58C87CB9F44943A7BBE78F2D6B62A850@us.oracle.com> <83botsf06d.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318306171 21064 80.91.229.12 (11 Oct 2011 04:09:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 11 06:09:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RDTef-000688-UB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:09:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48165 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDTef-0000MN-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:09:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36509) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDTea-0000MI-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDTeV-0004Wz-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:09:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:60613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RDTeV-0004Ws-JV; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LSV00H00VFW5C00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:09:14 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.91.138]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LSV00HJSVJC5B00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:09:14 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144860 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80281 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:43:55 -0400 > Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams , > miles@gnu.org > > > I don't think `mailclient-send-it' is a very satisfactory solution for > > sending email. > > Agreed. We need something better. So is this a NO to my question regarding making mailclient-send-it the default for Windows?