From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:44:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355024723 29341 80.91.229.3 (9 Dec 2012 03:45:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 03:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 09 04:45:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXpY-0002QQ-TC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 04:45:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXpM-0000GR-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:45:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXpJ-0000FV-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXpF-0004VD-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:45:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:55031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ThXpF-0004Uf-NS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:45:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEQ00E00VR5B100@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:45:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEQ00DQYVR7PC90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:45:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155391 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:06:14 -0500 > > IIRC the Windows bootstrap code is not as well tuned, and byte-compiles > all the .el files with the "bootstrap-emacs" instead of only compiling > the preloaded files this way. That might explain it (the > "bootstrap-emacs" is an emacs binary built with the non-compiled Elisp > files, so its Elisp functions are slower). The more important reason is that byte compilation on Windows during bootstrap is done sequentially, whereas on Unix it's done in parallel (under "make -j").