From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:02:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83k3okizf0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87hajxqlly.fsf@yandex.ru> <20130401202613.0b4201e3@anarchist> <878v51aa2l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <80939D90-D007-4828-A622-C264E5FE27EB@mit.edu> <834nfoki0i.fsf@gnu.org> <193A25DA-1B82-4962-A11D-2CA49A0A674A@mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364925733 21192 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2013 18:02:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 20:02:41 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN5Xb-0005dX-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:02:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN5XD-0005WM-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:02:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN5X8-0005SW-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN5X7-0004jx-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:58871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN5X7-0004jb-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MKN00F003AX4A00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:57 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MKN00E9A3F73LM0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:01:55 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <193A25DA-1B82-4962-A11D-2CA49A0A674A@mit.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158558 Archived-At: > From: chad > Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:57:03 -0700 > Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org Development" > > I'm trying to help people (after rms asked) understand why, perhaps, > bzr development is in it's current sorry state. I clearly stated > up front that I was speculating and generalizing from my own > observations, rather than stating some truths about the universe. And I was trying to communicate that I think Stephen came much closer to the real reasons.