From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk r112979: * lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:33:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83k3lvvkm7.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371285244 6152 80.91.229.3 (15 Jun 2013 08:34:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Xue Fuqiao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 10:34:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlvu-0001ku-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:34:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38247 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlvu-0007vk-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlvr-0007ve-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlvp-000628-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:50978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Unlvo-00061x-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOF00L00EBC4U00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:33:22 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOF00K6LEFMXI40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:33:22 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160446 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:10:14 +0800 > From: Xue Fuqiao > Cc: emacs-devel > > Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > === modified file 'etc/ChangeLog' > > --- a/etc/ChangeLog 2013-06-13 17:52:21 +0000 > > +++ b/etc/ChangeLog 2013-06-14 02:31:28 +0000 > > @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ > > +2013-06-14 Stefan Monnier > > + > > + * NEWS (utf-8 for el): Move to the incompatible section. > > + > > In this thread[fn:1], RMS said that there's no need to make change log > entries for NEWS. Should this entry be removed? There's no need for trivial entries like "mention FOO in NEWS". But there's no rule that _none_ of the changes in NEWS should ever be mentioned in etc/ChangeLog. So if someone feels the need to document some non-trivial change in NEWS, that's perfectly OK.