From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk emacs infelicity with linum mode Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:37:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83k35jdyf2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjeix7hg.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <838um1gar9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppfdyhpf.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <8361h5g7mv.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjehw5cs.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <834mwog0u0.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq9kd5y3.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <83oauve75i.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409855913 9625 80.91.229.3 (4 Sep 2014 18:38:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: srivasta@ieee.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 04 20:38:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPbvN-0004t3-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:38:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPbvD-0007dY-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:38:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPbuj-0007HK-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPbue-0008UW-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:40826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPbue-0008UR-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NBE00F00361IM00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:36:27 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NBE007EG3ORAI90@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:36:27 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174015 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Manoj Srivastava , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:56:09 -0400 > > > Also, I think linum-update-window should do nothing if 'linum' is not > > a valid face on the selected frame, because functions in > > window-configuration-change-hook can be called in many situations on > > which linum has no control. > > This brings a new concept to me: how can a face be invalid in a specific > frame? I think it's because the face was not yet realized for that frame. Before we create a new frame, we realize its basic faces, but not the rest. I think.