From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk r117932 build failure on mingw64 Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:16:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83k34twcfi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mw9pwcql.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411553845 25933 80.91.229.3 (24 Sep 2014 10:17:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 24 12:17:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XWjdM-0004yy-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:17:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58675 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWjdM-0001pi-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWjdB-0001lb-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWjd6-0006se-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:57138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XWjd5-0006rC-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NCE00O00H86P000@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:11:18 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NCE00M4THMU6040@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:11:18 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <83mw9pwcql.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174683 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 13:10:10 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Andy Moreton > > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:28:39 +0100 > > > > The changes in r117932 break the mingw64 64bit build: > > It was already broken, you just didn't know that. We were assigning a > 64-bit value to a 32-bit struct member. The static assertion added by > Dmitry simply made that problem stare in our face. Correction: the change that caused this assignment was also part of r117932. So you were right.