From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speed of keyboard macro execution? Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:54:42 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2om9okd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151209163954.0cefcc7f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87si3bcltu.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <20151209180343.5a67c0e7@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83r3iu9rvp.fsf@gnu.org> <20151210120051.6be8201f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83oady9pch.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449770124 17013 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2015 17:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de, perry@piermont.com To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 18:55:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a75Qw-0004TH-3I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:55:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a75Qv-0002zu-HG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a75Qe-0002zY-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:55:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a75Qb-0002hx-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:54:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:65523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a75Qb-0002hs-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:54:53 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500L00LIB5F00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:54:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ500LP1LR11670@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:54:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196036 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: "Perry E. Metzger" , deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:43:19 -0800 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> We may, as a developer community, have allowed the speed of modern hardware > >> to lull us into complacency on issues like performance. Emacs should be the > >> best editor it can be. > > > I agree. The issue is how to solve those problems, not whether we want to or > > should. > > Yes, and one of the best ways to begin is principled and consistent > measurement. No argument here. Volunteers are welcome.