From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 6bd9d69: Fix documentation of 'global-disable-point-adjustment' Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:30:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2lwk0er.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160222173059.20603.67344@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459743735 1721 80.91.229.3 (4 Apr 2016 04:22:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 04:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 20:32:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwDk-0005Or-RO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:32:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51466 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwDk-0007E9-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:32:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwCJ-0004Ky-PY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwCF-00033S-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwCF-00033O-5V; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1526 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwCD-0001Zp-7m; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:31:02 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:50:37 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202665 > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:50:37 -0500 > > > +After a command is executed, if point moved into a region that has > > +special properties (e.g. composition, display), Emacs adjusts point to > > +the boundary of the region. But when a command binds this variable to > > +non-nil, this point adjustment is suppressed. > > Why did you replace "sets" with "binds"? > AFAIK let-binding this variable has no effect because the variable is > consulted only after the command finishes, i.e. after the binding has > been undone. Who said anything about let-binding?