From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why does the tutorial talk about C-n/C-p etc? Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:16:37 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2lal34q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y49q64eg.fsf@russet.org.uk> <837fhamxwq.fsf@gnu.org> <87io0u4bip.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83mvq6l4qc.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvq6wcyw.fsf@mbork.pl> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457626615 10760 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2016 16:16:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 17:16:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ae3GU-0003Sj-KH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:16:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae3GT-0004on-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:16:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae3GN-0004oW-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:16:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae3GI-0002Io-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:16:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae3GI-0002Ie-AE; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:16:30 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2100 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ae3GA-0004Gv-V5; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:16:23 -0500 In-reply-to: <87mvq6wcyw.fsf@mbork.pl> (message from Marcin Borkowski on Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:48:39 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201399 Archived-At: > From: Marcin Borkowski > Cc: Phillip Lord , larsi@gnus.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:48:39 +0100 > > > > I think we'd welcome patches to bring it to this time, thanks. > > The question is: should the tutorial be patched, or rewritten from > scratch? A patch can do both, right?