From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:47:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83k2l8gmsz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838u1uuuau.fsf@gnu.org> <878u1um2xl.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87fuw090k7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y49spuxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov4achc.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <83r3fkpb3u.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh5rps0t.fsf@gnu.org> <56E066BD.5050403@cs.ucla.edu> <83wpp9jt82.fsf@gnu.org> <87pov1dje9.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <83pov0j2c6.fsf@gnu.org> <87egbgeqpv.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <838u1oixx0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn6keq1i.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <834mcciwju.fsf@gnu.org> <87io0sl6am.fsf@vostro.rath.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457768901 1893 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2016 07:48:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nikolaus Rath Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 08:48:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aeeHX-0007qf-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:48:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeeHW-0006Ct-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeeHJ-0006Cj-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeeHG-0005H2-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeeHG-0005Gy-I1; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4781 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aeeHF-0008Ar-QF; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 02:47:58 -0500 In-reply-to: <87io0sl6am.fsf@vostro.rath.org> (message from Nikolaus Rath on Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:32:49 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201527 Archived-At: > From: Nikolaus Rath > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:32:49 -0800 > > On Mar 11 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Nikolaus Rath > >> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:08:09 -0800 > >> > >> Please do not Cc me on replies, I am reading the list. > > > > That's the standard way of replying to a message: to the From address > > and to the CC address. I edited out yours this time, but I cannot > > afford doing that every time; if you want not to receive direct > > replies, you will have to configure your MUA to insert the necessary > > headers (like Mail-followups-to etc.). > > Well, my messages all contain both: > > Mail-Copies-To: never > Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > ..is there any other convention that I'm not yet following? I think you need "Reply-to: emacs-devel@gnu.org" as well.