From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.orgmode,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch? Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:34:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83k28v2zj0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org> <87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> <87a8a4ees0.fsf@engster.org> <87poiz2raf.fsf@engster.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486913741 6466 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2017 15:35:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 16:35:37 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwBc-0001QG-H0 for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:35:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52428 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwBi-0005mh-5I for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:35:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwAv-0005lE-Jf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:34:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwAu-0000IK-Kj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwAq-0000He-0v; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:34:48 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3716 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwAo-0006LI-PC; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:34:47 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:46:09 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.orgmode:112068 gmane.emacs.devel:212284 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 18:46:09 -0800 > Cc: Bastien Guerry , Emacs developers , > Phillip Lord , > emacs-org list , > Kaushal Modi > > I hear your other points, so I'm curious now as to what more people think > about this who work on Emacs core: Do you want more modularity with regard > ELPA, or does the monolithic model work better for you? AFAIU, the main motivation for the "drive to ELPA" comes from developers of individual packages, not from those working on the core (even though some package developers also work on core).