From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does Emacs return memory to the system on Mac OS X or *BSD? Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 05:36:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83k25o9l11.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831srwbqz9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494470241 22219 195.159.176.226 (11 May 2017 02:37:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 02:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: theophilusx@gmail.com, georgie@southernohio.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 04:37:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d8dye-0005gc-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 04:37:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45659 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8dyk-0008VA-7V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8dya-0008UI-QE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8dyZ-00023A-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8dyZ-000235-RL; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1582 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d8dyY-00011l-VE; Wed, 10 May 2017 22:37:11 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 10 May 2017 20:06:05 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214787 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: George Plymale II , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers > Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 20:06:05 -0400 > > IOW the only difference is in the fact that it requires more swap space, > which can occasionally be noticeable, e.g. when you don't have swap > space at all. No, it also means that part of the VM address space is in use and cannot be used by other apps.