From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: binding S-mouse-1 Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:41:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83k24yenz3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170529.081410.444201645.tak.kunihiro@gmail.com> <83lgpgfkox.fsf@gnu.org> <20170530.172028.58273635.tak.kunihiro@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496134169 16283 195.159.176.226 (30 May 2017 08:49:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Tak Kunihiro Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 30 10:49:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dFcqB-00040F-1J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:49:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFcqG-0001P7-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:49:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFci7-0004LF-4I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFci6-0006hH-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dFci2-0006gm-M2; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1936 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dFci1-00035I-PV; Tue, 30 May 2017 04:40:58 -0400 In-reply-to: <20170530.172028.58273635.tak.kunihiro@gmail.com> (message from Tak Kunihiro on Tue, 30 May 2017 17:20:28 +0900 (JST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215348 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:20:28 +0900 (JST) > Cc: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Yuri Khan > , tak.kunihiro@gmail.com > From: Tak Kunihiro > > >>> All that just to provide some kind of "consistency"? I'm not sure > >>> it's a good enough reason for changing such a veteran behavior. > > >> Shift should modify operation by mouse-1. I think `extend region' can > >> be regarded as modified set-point; however mouse-appearance-menu has > >> significant distance from set-point. > > > But I don't think we should change the default behavior of S-mouse-1. > > How do you think about reason that I inferred, consistency within > Emacs? Consistency has never been a reason strong enough to change a long-standing behavior.