From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:41:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83k1y2xx6g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171129233238.504B5204F1@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <5d668ce5-1482-a3d4-c01b-7d996a532567@yandex.ru> <20171130214621.GA22157@ACM> <27985594-3bb4-ce88-8928-2ccfeac13eae@yandex.ru> <20171201154913.GB3840@ACM> <3549c65b-e545-bd47-c25b-3a2c1e730804@yandex.ru> <021066bf-729d-4305-3e09-9b76ba353e0d@yandex.ru> <8352c7cc-a766-6b1f-5e9e-bb0c17256d4c@yandex.ru> <83shcszdji.fsf@gnu.org> <83efobyxfz.fsf@gnu.org> <1684cb2f-8439-79ee-5319-0f52215e1dea@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512405789 5974 195.159.176.226 (4 Dec 2017 16:43:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, tom@tromey.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, spinuvit@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 17:43:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtpY-0000rU-B7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:42:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtpf-0007Pb-H7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtoc-0007OK-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:41:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtoZ-0006ho-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtoZ-0006hk-Fw; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:41:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4347 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtoY-0007QU-JF; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:41:55 -0500 In-reply-to: <1684cb2f-8439-79ee-5319-0f52215e1dea@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:53:09 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220706 Archived-At: > Cc: acm@muc.de, tom@tromey.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, spinuvit@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:53:09 +0000 > > Point is, putting mmm-mode in ELPA or not is the developer's choice. That's true, but why would a developer object to including his/her package in Emacs? It will get better integration, better maintenance, better publicity, etc. Sounds like win-win to me.