From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs-27 60c84ad: ; * etc/TODO: Fix last change.
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:24:01 +0200
Message-ID: <83k13yvn8u.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200229173124.11831.98476@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <m2pnduzw5s.fsf@gmail.com> <jwveeua1yq3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m28skizfbc.fsf@gmail.com> <83eeuay0ch.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m24kv6zdbv.fsf@gmail.com> <m2wo81y531.fsf@gmail.com>
 <83d09txw29.fsf@gnu.org> <m2lfogy45m.fsf@gmail.com>
 <m2d09sxyhy.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfogw1gn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2v9nkvz5y.fsf@gmail.com> <83eeu8vy0e.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2mu8vw97b.fsf@gmail.com> <83v9njutez.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m28skfw774.fsf@gmail.com> <83tv33uop0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m24kv3w2st.fsf@gmail.com> <83o8tbunzh.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2zhcusvud.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfoevod9.fsf@gnu.org> <m2v9nisup7.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="57094"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 16:24:57 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1j9sMq-000Ejx-Uh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:24:56 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51106 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1j9sMq-0007AN-1X
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:24:56 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46324)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1j9sMH-0006XZ-8d
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:24:22 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45510)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1j9sMG-0005ib-VL; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:24:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2336 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1j9sMG-0003qL-B4; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:24:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m2v9nisup7.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 05
 Mar 2020 16:11:16 +0100)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245271
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/245271>

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:11:16 +0100
> 
>     Eli> I think we should just produce the definition of the 'emoji' script in
>     Eli> charscript.el, and then modify fontset.el to use Not Color Emoji for
>     Eli> that script.
> 
> OK. So basically weʼre inventing an 'emoji' script

Yes.

> that has little to do with Unicode's idea of emoji.

I don't think it has little to do with the Unicode idea, it just
doesn't use the database.  The blocks I was talking about are all
Emoji blocks, and Unicode is generally careful to put related
characters into the same blocks.