From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow inhibiting 'auto-save-visited-mode' on a per-buffer
 basis.
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 16:07:19 +0300
Message-ID: <83k12qp1mg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200401175736.203124-1-phst@google.com> <83wo6yxb0s.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwvwo6xoqxl.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAArVCkTisF77ra2a=m8hzgTP2u8d+pXKVnXs=nm+-Zr34a-gxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <jwva73qhvjk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAArVCkTk51a_3r7eAzS8wYkXJSE69=HVQkpnpr7_4y1zRmew0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <jwvimidhipb.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAP-RRPvkP9MaP2B0DBhBcRX=1WpY0Mo2f109WxXo1ai2C-7D1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP-RRPtsxjrGKxx77f+iLzrFxODnQk1quU-wV4w27Yxf=kPO5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <83lfn6p4kw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAP-RRPsEMnTjtsESf6e7PL3sZj-P4jEcqkO+PUMOUJk38EJ5=g@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="70498"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Philipp Stephani <phst@google.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 08 15:07:57 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jMAQv-000IG3-Ba
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 15:07:57 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35900 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jMAQu-0001gD-D0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:07:56 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40919)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jMAQN-0001F8-E5
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:07:25 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53444)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jMAQL-000065-Vx; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:07:22 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1107 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jMAQL-0001Qg-1G; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 09:07:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAP-RRPsEMnTjtsESf6e7PL3sZj-P4jEcqkO+PUMOUJk38EJ5=g@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Philipp Stephani on Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:19:44 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246665
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/246665>

> From: Philipp Stephani <phst@google.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:19:44 +0200
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>, 
> 	Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> > IMO, it depends on how popular the "disable locally" feature will be.
> > If we envision that many users will want to do that for some buffers,
> > then I think we'll need either a local minor mode or at least a
> > variable where you can specify which buffers are exempt from the
> > global mode.
> 
> Hmm, that variable is exactly what I'm proposing here?

No, not IIUC.  You proposed a buffer-local variable that has to be set
for each buffer where the global mode should be effectively disabled.
I was talking about a global variable with regular expressions that
match names of buffers where the user wants the global mode to be
disabled.