From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GDI+ take 3 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:15:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83k129exhd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d088fwgt.fsf@gnu.org> <835ze0fqk2.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgh3eogs.fsf@gnu.org> <838sitazal.fsf@gnu.org> <86imhxufx9.fsf@csic.es> <83y2qsap7r.fsf@gnu.org> <20200418201943.GA57763@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <868sirzsi3.fsf@csic.es> <867dybxmqh.fsf@csic.es> <837dyai8gh.fsf@gnu.org> <865zdt70ly.fsf@csic.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="104847"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juan =?utf-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Garc=C3=ADa-Ripoll?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 21 16:16:37 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQthU-000RCP-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:16:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59028 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQthT-0006Rc-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtgi-0005aX-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:15:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtgh-0004SJ-P7; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1763 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jQtgg-0004TT-1Q; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:15:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <865zdt70ly.fsf@csic.es> (juanjose.garciaripoll@gmail.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247468 Archived-At: > From: Juan José García-Ripoll > > Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:35:05 +0200 > > > Can you show the Lisp you used to time this? I'd like to see what > > times I get here. > > It is attached. Note that it is an ugly hack. I am rewriting > image-animate-timeout because I have to get access to the internal variables. That's okay, I just wanted to repeat the experiment. > To make an informed decision, it would be appropriate to know what happens on > other platforms. In OSX it seems that loading of gifs is fast enough that, like > GDI+, no fix would be required. What about Xwindows / Cairo? Does it vary much? > I do not have machines to gather this information I hope others will chime in with that info.