From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 18:32:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83k11us68d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> <83v9lesapw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbms9m8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="32963"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 17:32:58 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUu8P-0008Rl-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 17:32:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUu8O-0007Ig-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUu7n-0006tP-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:32:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUu7n-0006oU-Ey; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:32:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4787 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jUu7e-00039X-U6; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:32:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= on Sat, 2 May 2020 23:36:48 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248466 Archived-At: > From: 조성빈 > Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 23:36:48 +0900 > Cc: Philippe Vaucher , > Emacs developers , > Stefan Monnier , > Richard Stallman , > dgutov@yandex.ru > > "C-u C-h a file exist RET” on the other hand, gives me 9 functions in my > current session Which is quite small and reasonable. > This particular function is easy to find, since it employs the prefix scheme, > so I can just guess it starts with file and type file-exi and let > autocomplete help me, > but it still illustrates that C-u C-h a isn’t great enough. What's wrong with showing 9 candidates? Btw, in "emacs -Q" the above show only 5 hits.