From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode fontification feels random Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:11:37 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0n4dy5i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86a85d26-75c0-e4a3-e8d3-244c5346dd3a@dancol.org> <83r1hehnz9.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf7mhl3n.fsf@gnu.org> <73ff18bf-66dc-7d7a-a0db-8edc2cdceba8@gmx.at> <83o8cge4lg.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2797"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 08 20:16:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lqgH9-0000T2-Hx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 20:16:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56680 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqgH8-0004zZ-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqgCo-00026l-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqgCn-00040W-5W; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4268 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqgCf-00028x-G8; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:11:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:36:40 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270581 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rms@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, acm@muc.de, dancol@dancol.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:36:40 -0400 > > > static foo_t __attribute__((bar)) myvar; > > > > I'm not sure I'd care if everything before "myvar" would be in the > > same face and "myvar" in another face. IOW, it isn't necessarily > > important to me that fontification knows that foo_t is a type and not > > a keyword. So searching the file (and perhaps other files) for the > > definition of foo_t isn't important -- for the purposes of > > fontification. > > FWIW, my `font-lock-type-face` is customized to: > > '(font-lock-type-face ((t))) Does that make CC Mode bypass those scans from BOB?