From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better emoji support Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:25:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0jb1iqg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834kd2cypw.fsf@gnu.org> <87zguuttbm.fsf@gmail.com> <8335smcxx6.fsf@gnu.org> <87v95itsc4.fsf@gmail.com> <831r86cxdy.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6kgejp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnnkpjj9.fsf@gmail.com> <3E0155F6-D681-4443-A1D9-472D1836168D@traduction-libre.org> <87bl4rnyoe.fsf@gmail.com> <877dffnwf5.fsf@gmail.com> <875yuzciaf.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuijm9uy.fsf@gmail.com> <87lf3v2dz4.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilywl8tx.fsf@gmail.com> <877dfcz6zu.fsf@gmail.com> <83mto73mem.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee9jhint.fsf@gmail.com> <838rzr3fhm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7efk5c3.fsf@gmail.com> <83y27r1sku.fsf@gnu.org> <87czp3jt5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83lf3r1j8h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, kevin.legouguec@gmail.com To: rpluim@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 15:26:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJJl-0008HN-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:26:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJJi-0004Rg-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJJB-0003mQ-BF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJJB-0006Ud-3u; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1412 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSJJA-0004Tl-NB; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:26:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83lf3r1j8h.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:15:10 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275130 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:15:10 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > So we get to pick our poison: complete consistency with the > > Emoji_Presentation property from emoji-data.txt, or having complete > > coverage for emoji-zwj-sequences.txt. Eli? (Iʼll admit to having a > > slight preference for the latter, given that I find Emoji_Presentation > > to be somewhat arbitrary for quite a few codepoints) > > I agree: we should use the latter, at least for now. Btw, we could perhaps tweak the composition code to produce emoji representation for the likes of U+231A followed by VS-16, even though U+231A etc. aren't in the emoji script. Remind me about this after the basic emoji composition code is installed, and let's see if it could be improved for those sequences.