From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:21:30 +0300
Message-ID: <83k0ikqp1x.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8735p9jo51.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bl3xrwl0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <871r4sby3h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r1csrbxn.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="34060"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: juri@linkov.net
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 11 04:22:16 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZkxD-0008i5-Ou
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 04:22:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZkxC-0002e0-0a
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 22:22:14 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58852)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mZkwh-0001zV-Fg
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 22:21:43 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39220)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mZkwg-0008DB-FK; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 22:21:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1862 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mZkwg-0000z6-2D; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 22:21:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <83r1csrbxn.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 10
 Oct 2021 21:07:16 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276719
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/276719>

> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 21:07:16 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> If you don't want to use 4 or 5 for both, let's find a different
> letter, but make it identical for both "C-x 4" and "C-x 5".

How about "C-x 4 x" and "C-x 5 x". where "x" stands for "eXecute"?
An alternative could be "C-x 4 RET" and "C-x 5 RET".

Would any of these be acceptable?