From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can watermarking Unicode text using invisible differences sneak through Emacs, or can Emacs detect it? Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:57:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0eurg9m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sftk49ih.fsf@yahoo.com> <44d8c0ec505e2e45820f77be607db6d1@webmail.orcon.net.nz> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23909"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Phil Sainty Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 20 09:21:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nASgt-00062Q-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:21:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nASgh-0001lv-CY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 03:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nASK5-000686-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 02:57:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=36308 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nASK3-0005Jv-3o; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 02:57:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=NUD58NHF2nVHN5u5Ze5zySGmV9MDA7Ln5UUuWZnswt8=; b=CFNvQUvWB9TX ASD99TInxXgndiwmqtDEHMgUHVYMlLiv/rORSZuef8VwuGtUwkkakZsHc3Xr78fguWy2FYC0fHsEg l40sS5RxULuWrTZWiDzeL5a3jQmPd0g/kMjLp0HXxbkMOb+BHgvW2cYYsl/xbHciiIQ/2lAn5ee4O egA2YXMVJMduOSqkRMUGeK+vxuFyeM/v6l958DYOu1uR6H7GdvA+PWYJA77C+g6ONGGDFRceY1Hva m+j4IINtB3Hfs25Z3pAYQks5XHSEXre4mF6TCixuFbyYUWNYVHzjPRscV4Kqj6kEl7v1+dw2Y4xuJ QZvSgQsVPpcCmUe61NPlwQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3684 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nASJy-0005hs-JZ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 02:57:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <44d8c0ec505e2e45820f77be607db6d1@webmail.orcon.net.nz> (message from Phil Sainty on Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:54:24 +1300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285016 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:54:24 +1300 > From: Phil Sainty > > I've remembered a question on emacs.stackexchange.com about > customizing the glyphless char display, and doing so on a > per-mode basis; so just in case this is useful to anyone: > > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/65109 Yes, making it possible for glyphless display to be buffer-local is a useful feature we should have. Patches to that effect are welcome.