From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:09:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0bv679q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7.ref@Ergus> <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7@Ergus> <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411134749.ps6g5ulpbamzm6ot@Ergus> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 11 16:21:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nduuj-0008Je-0u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 16:21:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nduuh-0005BH-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nduoj-0002Is-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:14:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndujo-0007x1-Eo; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:09:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=mN2qZQiU2qyBuipYHyJwf69xeq8fJaUM3OrZGLbZsQ0=; b=BQoMrPxT3Uvo rrAkOynx/P2L7IGL+ffH/EPPMoxedWusGDiONc30qpJX5WgFcUb3MFY8H+Y9E8PppPLT5mpwT/4Cl mLsvws6p0pEcnF0CqZqCL3786EVolAbeRVo/HZv0BHL1w9/KBptKdUls2Wp8Yb7bjpQr0H5Rjgdko zBY5PBz6RZxUlcnWnKlGRBubClFL21xEGYslIXSeTnMNEUcWP1PHGnidMfoJVXQ8RziMbUO4mrejW Rr7Wy9NK/hphecp3rcBD5mGIoneyQtjbh9/hefOaAReCC9rxW16RtsPwF9XlBBSVwRW/AId0aU9+V RjpkUJ4lIOicdG89YrPV1Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4209 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndujm-00088V-SJ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:09:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20220411134749.ps6g5ulpbamzm6ot@Ergus> (message from Ergus on Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:47:49 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288208 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:47:49 +0200 > From: Ergus > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >Emacs doesn't need ctags > > So we shouldn't provide ctags by default. I'm opposed to dropping stuff just because we can. If you want to add an option not to install ctags if another version is installed (similarly to what we do with movemail), that's fine. But please don't argue for dropping parts of Emacs unconditionally because you personally find it not useful, that argument will never fly with me.