From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: OKURI-NASI Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 15:08:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0a3jk8m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y1ykxfd2.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu98xf5q.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtezkb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilpnxsfw.fsf@gnus.org> <83leujjlkj.fsf@gnu.org> <875ylnxn1a.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40059"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 30 14:17:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nveKg-000ABp-PP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 14:17:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52608 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nveKf-0006G4-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 08:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nveCO-0004Wu-1g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 08:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nveCN-0000dv-Ki; Mon, 30 May 2022 08:08:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=SAP8pYmVIwYht0hETzMGrYYsuI+QyVBT0pgv1rphh/o=; b=oRe2vZ6eypxT 5RTwTlA2RzpaMmDKyRIAfqMKKIktp6q9vI6eec0Sz6WW5OvPzTb03WeewXAqBKyGMdoSTuSMsguZh foiXeIVEge2JMDFUPPA0pJlsPLn/zhg63INmm53SoAw2+TsOgJudlzlZWyNORefv0QAFF8st8RTYY dL4TjOmrlO1w0uXmOe8IGtAbAJZAgcC4liNVnbDIRv6R8KzZd3PCFn+pZnUqeS/J261TzGjnt9gN5 HGKc+OhuZ6BvwiClYpNG8P+7EMHGXTPY/e+RI1hVDZ6AbzjDf01Jn3PNjbvupR9WQrLVSo/xQEtJ2 Vm1fIXdGgJZGrh1m+6xAJA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3542 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nveCN-0004ny-5l; Mon, 30 May 2022 08:08:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875ylnxn1a.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 30 May 2022 13:44:33 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290379 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 13:44:33 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> We need leim-list.el, I think, and leim/Makefile generates both of > >> those files, so I think if we just decouple those things, then we > >> move the ja-dic.el compilation later. > > > > Does moving it later speed up its compilation considerably? > > Yes -- since lisp depends on leim, we're stalling in a single-threaded > job after finishing bootstrap, but before doing lisp, I think? So we're > only using one CPU instead of all of them for 15 seconds. Why is that job single-threaded? leim has more than one file to build, so maybe we should rearrange the Makefile to allow a better parallelism? IOW, perhaps the single-threaded job you see is simply the result of all the other sub-jobs in leim being completed, and this is the only one that's left. Or maybe remove ja-dic.el from the 'all:' target in leim/Makefile and move it to lisp/Makefile, where it will compete for CPU units with more jobs?