From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: --with-native-compilation build failure on 32-bit systems Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:22:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83k075fx6r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86k07nl9qe.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <87bksyc36k.fsf@gnus.org> <83h72lvf8g.fsf@gnu.org> <838rnmceq7.fsf@gnu.org> <83lermarzk.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilmpc2bi.fsf@gnu.org> <83h729c07k.fsf@gnu.org> <83fshtbsy0.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5117"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, jrm@ftfl.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs@FreeBSD.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 18 16:23:45 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOgQz-0001Ac-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:23:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOgQy-0007LH-PB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:23:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46324) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOgQK-0006ey-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOgQH-00035J-Jz; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:23:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=JwisLaPHyZrcBkqPhZlSECB0pzNRujkzrp3d8jAiYb0=; b=QSBb+8YNvklE WASvqZPL8rw8F4P/PbwJTj/innXoO3aIIyfMFR7xq9Iq5M1Og5ZA8sLCbfHpuqPSfcPQFzszvtYT5 NQ1QWIsHacVyYY0PqEU1kympdEC6eAbyilEUanqCGkEmDByrCWYRCSiM6On7BxPAwKetQms7GIpMA qA/gQEB0zM+HnMpJNs5wfTgOhHnrvKTqmKKAKnXOCF15KQ6bhRdh66FLefKReGz+dKPV8pt7IZPKb ARWlqybbYkb5AnmF1vL4n2XTBGzSuST2dGlQaRVLViXwuCOK0qLPR7wAcq0sXU9Pd7ZnCvjw1KVF0 +GxckaUG/njzelaqd+98Vg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3516 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOgQG-0001Ze-Ts; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 10:23:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:09:45 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293610 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, jrm@ftfl.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs@FreeBSD.org > Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 14:09:45 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Andrea Corallo > >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, jrm@ftfl.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs@FreeBSD.org > >> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:08:32 +0000 > >> > >> On 64bit I get: > >> > >> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 3366891 bytes needed) > >> > >> On 32: > >> > >> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2549794 bytes needed) > > > > That's soooo strange! If I start Emacs under GDB and print the value > > of PURESIZE, I get 6000000 bytes in a 64-bit build and 4480000 bytes > > in a 32-bit build --with-wide-int. What values do you see? > > > > Maybe the problem happens only in --without-x builds? > > I get 2000000 on the 32bit build and 3333333 on 64 bit. Both are indeed > --without-x. According a to comment in puresize.h this has an effect. What is the value of SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA in both cases?