From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display of undisplayable characters: \U01F3A8 instead of diamond Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 18:05:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83k06sxvas.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tu5wy7jb.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7w4xxhq.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24498"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 28 17:06:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oSJri-0006Dl-Jz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 17:06:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSJrf-0004ZZ-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:06:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSJqr-0003ss-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSJqr-0000YC-Df; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:05:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=runCgXWV6DTYRrJB0s69JFBwqvp9+gYRdAm77EnMED0=; b=p/TB2/UOYZA2 K3cagInJOi57Ryz8CxoT8CnelTsdflRnXh6AhIHJcEbDvV+Dncy8ztROCEbyfdw0EEv58Z5H6LtF1 6hPpIHFYhpIsPmzmUFjPeyeheUYSRcHBHV/q+Y4N523Mcv1qiuU+8MODdhX+uf7TR8buevNpDvHYe aVIhwhrmoJV/MUWdEOpapuvuWgl9dIw2sovn1Ypo5sqz5vTPeQIg6Ri/5VJuTIlpPVd3QsGfp9ies SI35H/GO2Bvun+drzIKF37EdfsgWOGzuq8L1jwID+KD08qqQR3rbRUFf7+bfOCZ7X1jVNw/Hsxxwn 9s8iLyL+eVk5K7kRrIvn4g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2446 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSJqq-0006fI-GL; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:05:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Sun, 28 Aug 2022 14:44:41 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294242 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 14:44:41 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: acm@muc.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > And what does tty-type return when running Emacs on fbterm? > > "linux" Ouch! that's bed -- it means the change I installed on the release branch will affect fbterm as well, while it ideally shouldn't. Any idea whether there's an easy way of distinguishing between those two?