From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display of undisplayable characters: \U01F3A8 instead of diamond Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 15:36:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83k06mosv4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87edx28cl1.fsf@disroot.org> <83y1v7w6eu.fsf@gnu.org> <83a67iqo1k.fsf@gnu.org> <87k06m55mw.fsf@disroot.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38511"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Akib Azmain Turja Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 02 14:37:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oU5vX-0009p5-7k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 14:37:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60956 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU5vW-0000we-4I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU5uR-0008NA-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU5uQ-0004vv-4y; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:36:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=k7bcVu7SwKzzAtutmNu0n2uiWtEg67s+LsCR8CwYUnA=; b=G6cPgzWuf0Rs ZoBOEufF4J2a4WguaAIaNEAr2fUBP1+NhV+2e81KDGsIZHWPihJ2w2RP7JNV6QIIMhonUwXMJobOe DDH0n+KTtBXPM72kZIqQRkWa60A4xmCPL4WY9llc9gf8SI0/kC+C7Ze9f817V1cLgEAyXgUL3gf3i +Ap3ImB7goItiVeWgA4es0q2XojIM8e+08JzT4/+AD+mlXxA56y8VjlVLmMhZrQxzYyxgBP00a+Uj NHl9oLmqyFgPDnM0AlkaF5h+IFy2LFCRjIVSN5BHoOSwhiKT21DH0W/X9VokpCk5DLpUcajTSknY1 TNHYyg/QT04OuMOUPRPZ+g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4884 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU5uE-0001md-05; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:36:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k06m55mw.fsf@disroot.org> (message from Akib Azmain Turja on Fri, 02 Sep 2022 18:21:11 +0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294541 Archived-At: > From: Akib Azmain Turja > Cc: rms@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 18:21:11 +0600 > > > I hear you, but I'd suggest that you give fbterm a try. Who knows, > > maybe you will find that you like it. > > Or even better, install X and a terminal emulator and maximize the > terminal emulator window. There are many options, st, XTerm, Kitty, > GNOME Terminal, Konsole, etc. > > Or make Emacs your X Window Manager. There is a GNU ELPA package EXWM > for doing that. > > How about GNOME or KDE? Or even GNUStep? > > Even better, emulate Linux TTY on GNOME Terminal running on GNOME > desktop rendered using Sixels on XTerm. > > Or the best option, don't use computers at all. Your sarcasm is misplaced. Suggesting to use an alternative console terminal program is hardly something that needs to be laughed about. > Now let's come to the point, why switch to fbterm when the Linux > console works? Because fbterm is a better console terminal program? Because it supports more characters OOTB? > The buggy program (looks like it's Emacs here) should be fixed. If you can explain what are the bugs to which you allude, sure, we do want to fix bugs in Emacs.