From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias? Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 10:00:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83k05gvzsb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmfdduix.fsf@gnu.org> <86wn9ji3ma.fsf@gmail.com> <831qrozx71.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10586"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 09:11:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofc5c-0002ZG-O2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 09:11:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33696 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofc5a-0001L6-8I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 03:11:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofbv8-0005Gk-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 03:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofbv5-00080i-7z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 03:00:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Ol4Ne5eQEOxh3ZW43oUvE/TbZy48yQ/XZ+OrQ9P+7rY=; b=ly0Eh6Suob2H YIPLwhrwcUtVUrPIav8fnPD57oYgO/lsQdzP9yveKPttq5a9jLVDRJjaXuJprgxq/q/uEak5NTM/a 468kvZurV19JZQ8X2CcPZTzuLzZ2bwzRiBuEVviaciBheRsWNU4Cv6pFCL0O6NCVl49mh0p1gzT1I XxbvUc5J2KaEyCRoqgjgkkLrTh3CF73hldhCnGyYuErMAr69W8buI6cpXU20FtFfS7eu0cB5OZIfB paoWcq+sL9XqREwdb7jEYSbHCvLYtWrVXGntfU4Uml8xgmewgRckv2N2rQX9fKGu01ceTAA/3DfEj +mRhD33q6FMWmnST1HglPA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3370 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofbuy-00053K-Mf; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 03:00:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 03 Oct 2022 21:02:29 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296843 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 21:02:29 -0400 > > > > It's amazing how quickly people start saying it's too late to change > > > something. > > > That's on purpose: we are trying to speed up the Emacs release cycle, > > something that is a long-standing issue that users complain about. > > To speed it up does not require becoming rigid. To some degree, it does. It requires to deliberately reject unnecessary and low-importance changes that would have delayed the release.