From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 07:30:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83k059k49i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmfill6l.fsf@gnu.org> <87illaffm5.fsf@localhost> <838rm6ktxp.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ovdosz.fsf@localhost> <83o7umls4t.fsf@gnu.org> <87zge54r0m.fsf@rfc20.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10818"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yantar92@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matt Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 09 06:32:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNzA-0002bq-65 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 06:32:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNz8-0002Rh-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 00:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNxX-0001eG-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 00:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNxR-0001TP-No; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 00:30:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=b50S4mvnJXTflvYYfy34bQadBfDqTSq/2ZswGVxzBqE=; b=c1GsQPr/zauz gh2Msi1YwFZWZ55KDV7jWXJLMKweCUyGS50mNdPyo4O7PXomIVRjmDQbtEDzwPNU3XuiMX4JbssRa yDW3jGQQqlPg8DassGAsrCtcsDE9D9BQ5WqiwKS5K+lJ6LrwYxCZlYV5pnWW/Db0EFf/wH5Sy+Tea l3X9luxsH2gtoVAzMsCLUp76a2b7lUehsVqRTCW6p+izMuTv25V5OWeVvjt/wfaf837gY9tRkY2So 6B7E5JNudb7BFb4ThlRFkj5ILn9w7qnmdeKGucXpA6Xl/2mkmaShYkW68Unk9VXwE8lLuUVCRPOUF GmOvR5FUvLHdxLMj67KRvg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2047 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohNxP-0000Zs-94; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 00:30:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zge54r0m.fsf@rfc20.org> (message from Matt Armstrong on Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:25:45 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297241 Archived-At: > From: Matt Armstrong > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:25:45 -0700 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> We also have tests for marker scaling. If the overlay tree > >> implementation can be reused for markers, it would also be great. > > > > Not in Emacs 29, I'm afraid. > > Scalable markers will be *much* easier conceptually than overlays. I > had this in mind for a post noverlay work. I didn't say they were complicated.