From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Small bug-reference.el change; safe enough for emacs-29?
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 20:45:30 +0200
Message-ID: <83k00wq7cl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87o7q8x8qo.fsf@gnu.org> <87k00wx8l4.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="38831"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 19:45:44 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1pOk1H-0009v4-5i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 19:45:43 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1pOk0w-0003jt-Eu; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:45:22 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1pOk0v-0003jP-E1
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:45:21 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1pOk0u-0001SH-Hc
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:45:21 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=te5d7ZsTx+LwQHWC6l7ZvxobxLlVvjcgiE74ySdor44=; b=R2xoZff7OYUB
 wms9jxvRSIunp72sUEQ9tjFia+C4p39BT0Fw3ZacqL5qlDnSCQ5QXlHBGRp9wztP/spNwiI9jTQhZ
 KWiaKqD6aLEAO4wNVaHP2crQVvB6pS1p1ZVzzcqaqQLhyBQU7rNRyoeMy492v7lhnDodWV4kqYado
 GNVhXEtqVcBhvuuK41hv+JRM6NND/pT0mf7NqYrk8KGpd9GdsFCIwpDzc2Yrp6phz85vrwNCtq5dJ
 qYGQl286QA/fEt2iItQ6noLcOSN2hfl0skLiGF3bPKC3PHzjvkxUx23eIsA324PMmagxvKL5JFur8
 WbWR0Ql1YuaNcoDyfkc0/A==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1pOk0t-0007yK-10; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:45:19 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87k00wx8l4.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Tassilo Horn on Sun, 05
 Feb 2023 19:35:18 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303010
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/303010>

> From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 19:35:18 +0100
> 
> I've missed the final ? in the subject

I didn't.

> and so the point of the message didn't get through:

It did.

> do you agree the change is safe enough for emacs-29?

Yes, thanks.