From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: HAVE_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 19:22:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83jzyvy3l3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sfdmlgzx.fsf@gmail.com> <94d3de92c50a96d9172f88462bf3bc9c2792600c.camel@gmail.com> <83mt3s244o.fsf@gnu.org> <875yagtopn.fsf@yahoo.com> <838rfc17ja.fsf@gnu.org> <871ql4t8ph.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wn2wyuli.fsf@gnu.org> <63A29442-4C0C-4C3C-B40E-4A3DB91E3009@gmail.com> <83lejcypyw.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2wrmgc.fsf@yahoo.com> <83bkk7zvxl.fsf@gnu.org> <87lejbpxkm.fsf@aarsen.me> <83zg7rybfo.fsf@gnu.org> <86h6tzr4b2.fsf@aarsen.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35174"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, vibhavp@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 01 18:23:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pie0Z-0008yT-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 18:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pidzv-0006Yh-0C; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:22:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pidzt-0006WU-3u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:22:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pidzs-0003Kv-Mi; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:22:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=Mf3ilXZScJ44NN+LfzB91GgL0YeGH0QfewV+kuoTMuE=; b=QndRxQ5piitdQ4rKX7gc 4ypCRLJC8c9+BdKq5g3FQr0m3jwHmEAYlBYGaU7vRHQjoKpwDxJ7PR9dKNNfgTGtKUqJuyXDIUvbH yEAmp+1pYEKgUaXPDLV+yIV/ByO6dGR3SmJ1fYFYiXr5mQCs+PlQ2ZjuRgEMHeuDg6apjuLcsiQPC mEDbnnu/399XGcB0dfhjKU0EqnWGU6F5pNpG2c0RyGzeJYRB+NRAA8DJjDmxtfF+PEM6x3kF7sO5K 7judq2Im8y3KcT1eczH6ufkgnYgsrp+WKBvXR4uT9u/x7jq+5YxKv543irdlG3WFOp4EsmEY6qoxP Ht7GwFeORAf+fw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pidzr-00020F-DT; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:22:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86h6tzr4b2.fsf@aarsen.me> (message from Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arse?= =?utf-8?Q?novi=C4=87?= on Sat, 01 Apr 2023 17:22:48 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305018 Archived-At: > From: Arsen Arsenović > Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, mattias.engdegard@gmail.com, vibhavp@gmail.com, > rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 17:22:48 +0200 > > I understand why you're arguing this, and I have to thank you for it - > such efforts keep Emacs as stable as it is - but this feels like an > example that is too trivial to apply such judgment to, hence my > position. I am certain that you have an understanding of the issue at > hand, I'm only trying to provide a solution that's safe enough for 29. Among other reasons, we'd need a real-life case where this code fails to test any solutions.