From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: persist.el vs. multisession.el? Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:07:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83jzyjbu05.fsf@gnu.org> References: <46b3da74-b8cb-229f-1c5b-4d67050b352a@alphapapa.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39352"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adam Porter , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 10 18:08:09 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1plu3t-0009wr-20 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 18:08:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plu32-0003r0-9k; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plu30-0003qm-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plu30-0007Er-DV; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:07:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=b/xk5ipNukzA8B4kfG7SwCmJ10zKvCswkHCmpMazjgk=; b=sgJuUqyZGF5p MDKBU30dqk7zpG7O0uqJYw8E+r9sVgxE6J84iQbKbBxPX1P0e/cpAJnm6kBZQ3uAVUwKx7ukj1OyJ BUnjf4nbRaaPIqyLeFqS0FlYTjO6aO9DOm/UAjZTo4abbSotO726nfV7EsRjLNSlnPSXvIk9UKvdx JGRmsA1k7gxOcTmFhuj9/MuI2zrK8bsJaEHpZuhUuOVJob8U6u4sqnNTC4ms2QatN2fj/YHGbpC8w I0FsaU9cyAgMnOl+H2VsY1tIK+2xiHQfvpEEbhHlkj1M4Y71VjD1jCdN4TlEN+InqzJF4y73tjn5t Vub7qsjm8uc3r7ruST/nHA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1plu2z-0002RV-NE; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:07:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46b3da74-b8cb-229f-1c5b-4d67050b352a@alphapapa.net> (message from Adam Porter on Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:25:47 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305227 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:25:47 -0500 > From: Adam Porter > > [Please cc me on replies.] That's SOP here. > Browsing the Emacs 29 pretest NEWS file, I see that multisession.el will > be a new built-in library. I'm curious about how this relates to the > persist.el library that's been in GNU ELPA for a while. Will there be > any reason for users to use persist.el instead of multisession.el? > Should persist.el be (eventually) obsoleted? Adding Lars, in the hope that he could have some comments, as the author of multisession.el.