From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should undefined behavior be encouraged in Emacs? Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:46:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83ipo1hmqg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4E89124D.8070405@cs.ucla.edu> <4E895885.5060201@online.de> <87ehyu1qk7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4E89794F.8040706@online.de> <87zkheg8xc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <874nzlsxwf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4E8E0AB4.1050900@online.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317934008 12330 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 20:46:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 22:46:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuq4-00053L-14 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:46:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33873 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuq3-0004ms-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:46:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBupy-0004jZ-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:46:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBupu-0003BE-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBupt-0003Az-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:46:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LSN00F00WCO2P00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:46:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.91.138]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LSN00EUPWDGMO80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:46:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144642 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:12:53 +0200 > > I, like (I'm assuming) all other oldey-timey Emacs users :-), disabled > `transient-mark-mode' the first chance I got. And the reason for that > is that `C-x C-x' activates the region, which makes it impossible to use > that command to jump around in buffers. Which I do constantly. > > If that rather odd overloading of the `C-x C-x' command went away, I > might start using `transient-mark-mode'. It didn't.