From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Version 6.1 of the Unicode Standard is released Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:09:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83ipjpp3gl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y5smpizu.fsf@gnu.org> <4F297B16.8030900@cs.ucla.edu> <87y5sllast.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328202699 5712 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2012 17:11:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 18:11:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt0C9-0001ly-Bb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:11:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47319 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt0C8-0000EU-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:11:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt0C5-0000Dv-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt0C4-0007yj-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:11:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:47573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt0By-0007uW-3N; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:11:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYR00F00YKJXL00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:11:13 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.37.111]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYR00FHIZQMD7B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:11:11 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87y5sllast.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148121 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:44:18 +0800 > > That said, I don't object in principle to upgrading to Unicode 6.1. > Could someone post the diff? The diffs are 1144 lines long (including context; "diff -u0" produces 856 lines). If you still want to see it posted here, I will.