From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build using Posix configury Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:44:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83ip3l2e0t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d2tu49lu.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjwx3lwt.fsf@gnu.org> <3mfvyp7jx6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83r4i92jdk.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwsx2h8o.fsf@gnu.org> <29a9oxcaca.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366224249 32572 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2013 18:44:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 17 20:44:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1USXKz-0004lv-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USXKy-000215-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USXKv-00020f-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USXKu-0001CG-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USXKu-0001Bu-5s; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MLE00500XBDS300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:44:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MLE005E3XDES600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:44:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158984 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:15:14 -0400 > > So probably we should just go back to using "ln", and forget about > AC_PROG_LN_S, sigh. (Or write our own test for the features of ln -s > that we want to use). In any case, it's not something you should have > had to worry about as part of your changes, sorry. OK, thanks. So I will see what happens on the mainline, and take it from there.