From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git transition issues Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:17:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83ioj0zjgn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20141027000718.F09B5382A66@snark.thyrsus.com> <20141027012827.GA10163@thyrsus.com> <20141028163655.GB10490@thyrsus.com> <8361f42hw9.fsf@gnu.org> <20141028180738.GA13564@thyrsus.com> <8338a82h1g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414773089 9087 80.91.229.3 (31 Oct 2014 16:31:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 31 17:31:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XkF6d-0004di-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:31:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkF6c-00019K-Nf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XkDpY-0005p8-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xk8L6-0004z2-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:56105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xk8L5-0004xp-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NEA00I00XDGP800@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:16:13 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NEA00D4ZXR1YU60@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:16:13 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176081 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:58:33 -0400 > Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > No, I think you're absolutely right. Maybe not all the changes need to > be backported, but many of them should. I recommend to backport > most/all of them as a single commit. I ended up backporting all of them, but in 3 different commits. A few unrelated commits were done in-between Eric's, and since bzr doesn't by default allow merging when there are uncommitted changes (and I didn't want to use --force to override that), I couldn't easily commit all the cherry-picked revisions in one go. But I think 3 is not that bad. (The 3rd one is Glenn's revert of one part of Eric's commits.)