From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Calling Lisp from undo.c's record_* functions Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83io4z9ozx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r3jpc2of.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9kkbz6k.fsf@russet.org.uk> <838u5wbmvu.fsf@gnu.org> <83ziyc9zs0.fsf@gnu.org> <83wptg9dcd.fsf@gnu.org> <87610zsd3u.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447869013 1790 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2015 17:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 18:50:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6rp-00021W-5n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:50:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37304 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6ro-00040X-KY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:50:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6rb-00040G-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6rX-00019r-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:49:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:49705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz6rX-00019c-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:49:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NY000400UFCR800@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:49:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NY00023JUTPHY30@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:49:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87610zsd3u.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194729 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: Stefan Monnier , > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:31:33 +0000 > > > But if an idle timer is fine, I think Phillip already has everyuthing > > sorted out on a branch. > > Not entirely. Either the idle timer runs all the time (which Stefan > doesn't like), or we only run it once (which missed the case when a > process runs). Really? IOW, an idle timer doesn't run when we have read something from a subprocess, and return to the waiting loop? I would expect the idle timers to run in that situation.