From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Module tests Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 05:38:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83io4bdj26.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvtnea4r.fsf@gnu.org> <5664BD0B.30900@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449459643 9428 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2015 03:40:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 03:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 04:40:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a5mfC-00028F-3B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 04:40:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52344 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5mfB-00014g-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:40:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5mdX-0006hA-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:38:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5mdU-0007jN-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:38:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:39064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5mdT-0007jH-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 22:38:48 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYY00I00XQ65D00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 05:35:47 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYY00FQMXZNZP20@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 05:35:47 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5664BD0B.30900@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195940 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:56:11 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I don't understand why the removal. > > Those tests failed on 32-bit Emacs configured --without-wide-int, as 1+ silently > wraps around whereas mod-test-sum signals an integer overflow. Plus, on a > 32-bit-only Emacs #x20000000 evaluates to a floating-point number -- a flaw in > Emacs, but is probably not something we can fix during a feature freeze. > > Sorry, I hadn't realized the points of those tests, and thought my replacements > were testing the same thing. I just now brought those tests back and ported them > to 32-bit-only Emacs. Thanks!