From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining] Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 21:19:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83inv9hkjd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fuqnm6og.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg67m3aq.fsf@gnu.org> <20160808143614.GA7208@acm.fritz.box> <83mvkni7xf.fsf@gnu.org> <20160808165449.GB7208@acm.fritz.box> <83d1lji3ih.fsf@gnu.org> <20160808184223.GC7208@acm.fritz.box> <838tw7hyk2.fsf@gnu.org> <20160808195459.GD7208@acm.fritz.box> <83tweugeu9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160809163814.GD4893@acm.fritz.box> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470767127 24611 195.159.176.226 (9 Aug 2016 18:25:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 09 20:25:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bXBiM-0006H2-0F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 20:25:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXBiI-0002NA-Sz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 14:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXBdb-0006N4-0k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 14:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXBda-0008TU-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 14:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXBda-0008Ss-1K; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 14:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2957 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bXBdW-0001BW-4j; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 14:20:24 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:14:56 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206519 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:14:56 -0400 > > > This variable holds a list of functions to call before _ANY_ buffer > > modification. > > I think this description is correct. If there's a modification where we > forget to run the hook, please report it as a bug. I think this is just an argument about the definition of "modification". When a modification is done piecemeal, not every partial modification calls the before hook.