From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-other-frames Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:46:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83inuoewjy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <57BC072F.9070704@gmx.at> <83k2f7fugv.fsf@gnu.org> <57BD63A9.8040502@gmx.at> <57BEB772.60100@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472136417 21926 195.159.176.226 (25 Aug 2016 14:46:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 25 16:46:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bcvvf-0005FN-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:46:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56647 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcvvc-0006aX-Em for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcvum-0006Yl-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:46:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcvuh-0004QO-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:45:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bcvuh-0004Q7-B7; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:45:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4379 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bcvuf-0005ap-JE; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:45:50 -0400 In-reply-to: <57BEB772.60100@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:16:34 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206799 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:16:34 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I have two versions to accomplish that: One based on calling > > ‘next-frame’ exhaustively ... > > I've used that, added an Elisp manual entry and tried to clarify > some related doc issues. Thanks. For the future, please adopt the following style: This function deletes the specified @var{frame}. rather than using this: This function deletes the frame @var{frame}. The former reads as less awkward English and avoids using the same word twice in a row.