From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:59:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83intid7wf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877fa12iyq.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83h995ay04.fsf@gnu.org> <87y42h13pi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83fuopax4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87twd512pk.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <831t07bxlj.fsf@gnu.org> <8737kn37qe.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83vaxj9yhc.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474902020 5406 195.159.176.226 (26 Sep 2016 15:00:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 17:00:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boXO2-0008Ls-OX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:00:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45002 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boXO1-0006zy-2c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boXNT-0006zd-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:59:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boXNO-00026r-Rn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boXNJ-00022e-Jc; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1236 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1boXNH-0008Gl-Du; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:59:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:33:51 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207812 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:33:51 +0200 > > Consider admitting that you are wrong. Doing it is a sign of strength. This goes both ways, you know. Anyway, if we are still talking about Dired and having dired-mark-extension unmark as well as mark, then I proposed a solution yesterday that should let us eat the cake and have it, too. I hope it could become a middle ground and let us move on to more important issues.