From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 05:32:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83inkrm1ca.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2623E5C5-4D40-4C9F-BFF6-181D2E69F984@gmail.com> <831srgnuyc.fsf@gnu.org> <6BED2506-B1C2-4005-AFDE-2BF04209F16C@gmail.com> <83zie3mndz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495593194 27670 195.159.176.226 (24 May 2017 02:33:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 02:33:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 24 04:33:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDM6o-000744-02 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 04:33:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDM6r-0003N3-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 22:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDM6E-0003Mw-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 22:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDM69-0001SJ-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 22:32:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDM69-0001SE-SF; Tue, 23 May 2017 22:32:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1748 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dDM69-0001zp-4F; Tue, 23 May 2017 22:32:29 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Wed, 24 May 2017 07:00:46 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215149 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 07:00:46 +0900 > > > I'm not sure package.el is a good starting point. I think a much > > better starting point is to design the i10n infrastructure for Emacs. > > I'm not considering l10n right now. Only best practices for writing UI strings. IMO, such best practices will only make sense as part of some general l10n effort. But if you want to scratch that particular itch, no one can prevent you from doping that.