From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 c87d04e: Avoid aborts in 'md5' Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83inahyuq9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180227164448.16622.42058@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180227164448.E4B45207B1@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87h8q15xdo.fsf@gmx.de> <87606h5vlm.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519833259 18607 195.159.176.226 (28 Feb 2018 15:54:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 16:54:15 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1er43Y-0004A4-T1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:54:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45280 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er45Z-0006zI-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:56:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er44h-0006xe-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er44c-00041H-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:55:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1er44c-00041C-Df; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:55:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3439 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1er44b-0002mR-MC; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:55:18 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:15:04 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223172 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:15:04 +0100 > > > See bug#30627. > > So the CHECK_STRING should be put in the else branch. In general, safe code should check STRINGP before using SSDATA, so the way I did it is safer (and also more future-proof). > There is also a useless CHECK_BUFFER in the BUFFERP branch. Indeed.