From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs project mission (was Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [ Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:12:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83imncwcqs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191118175639.08d02820@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <874kz0pa9y.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgmjyn60.fsf@gmx.de> <87imnezyt5.fsf@gmx.de> <835zjdz58t.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="129616"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, dgutov@yandex.ru, larsi@gnus.org, perry@piermont.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 22 09:13:42 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iY44U-000XcU-LV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:13:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48356 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iY44T-0008Pb-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:13:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iY44O-0008PI-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iY44N-0001Ys-5d; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:13:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1158 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iY43J-0008DS-Kr; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 03:12:30 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:42:42 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242608 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, perry@piermont.com, michael.albinus@gmx.de, > dgutov@yandex.ru, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:42:42 -0500 > > > I think the idea is that most people nowadays have some kind of > > account already -- either in gmail, or in facebook, or in one of the > > other services that GitLab is capable of using instead of a GitLab > > specific registration. > > The GNU Project must never invite people to sign in to a GNU activity > using a Gmail or Facebook account. We don't. I'm just saying that many of them will, if we end up using GitLab. And I see no problem with that, exactly like we never ask them which browser they use to send email to us or look at bug reports on debbugs. > We will not _punish_ or _reject_ people just for using those sites That was my point, exactly. Alan seemed to say that we should punish them, or reject their submissions. Anyway, this is all very theoretical at this point, since GitLab has many other problems, which are of much more importance to us than this one.