From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-27 7ec66a5: Document spacing issues with Xft for some fonts Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:31:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83imle5a1p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200114095124.30450.15618@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200114095126.2A901212AE@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="269161"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 14 16:41:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1irOJa-0017a8-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:41:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irOJY-0003xU-Sr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1irOAL-0008Sz-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:31:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1irOAL-0001ec-7R; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:31:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4506 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1irOAJ-0004jv-Kc; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:31:37 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:17:45 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:244245 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:17:45 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Stefan> Does the use of Harfbuzz affect the result? > > I see this in an XFT build both with and without Harfbuzz. Which is expected: we only call HarfBuzz for character composition, not for "simple" text such as ASCII. Otherwise, we use the glyph metrics as returned by the lower-level facilities, in this case the Xft API that returns the "text extents".