From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 21:02:56 +0300
Message-ID: <83ime2ckhb.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200801141014.51E78C21C82@raman-glaptop.localdomain>
 <83wo2ictyz.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuxmctmo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20200801153823.GA55369@breton.holly.idiocy.org>
 <CAArVCkQ2RbM565grHuK9kL1e=oxN2SX1kMUwNuV3QtHKv_wuJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <83k0yicl01.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="17610"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, raman@google.com, alan@idiocy.org,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 01 20:03:47 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1k1vrG-0004TR-FC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:03:46 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1k1vrF-0000so-II
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:03:45 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35664)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1k1vqk-0000SS-0T
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:03:14 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39527)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1k1vqi-0004kw-5f; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:03:12 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2557 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1k1vqf-00008v-O5; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 14:03:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <83k0yicl01.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 01
 Aug 2020 20:51:42 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253384
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/253384>

> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:51:42 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com,
>  raman@google.com
> 
>    4641 |   void *po = (char *) ((intptr_t) (char *) XLP (obj)
> 	  |              ^
> 
> This is a 32-bit build --with-wide-int, in case it matters, where
> EMACS_INT is a 64-bit data type.

Btw, I'm probably missing something, because I don't understand how
XLP in its current definition can work in a --with-wide-int build,
where the size of a Lisp_Object is wider than both intptr_t and a
'void *'.