From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A proposal for a friendlier Emacs
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 19:18:03 +0300
Message-ID: <83imbthqdg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4be18b5f-dc07-2703-a2de-1ed08916ebdf@gmail.com>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2009171101350453.27164@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <c19c38c0-eff9-d80c-1f65-7fb3355b8dfa@gmail.com>
 <alpine.NEB.2.22.394.2009171142140453.31289@sdf.lonestar.org>
 <1e340d941b6fd0b21a477f39fc935468@condition-alpha.com>
 <E1kKZ82-0006WS-H0@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <62ff80b8ff943b698ef8c46849b8bc50@condition-alpha.com>
 <83y2l0vas0.fsf@gnu.org>
 <ab920d62fa14d3f39083f6debc405c6a@condition-alpha.com>
 <83lfgyrn57.fsf@gnu.org>
 <fb633e69b294e8835afb176b5ebe3d87@condition-alpha.com>
 <83h7rlsxpw.fsf@gnu.org> <E1kM1vO-0005is-UT@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <0e3f9f50238be8a62b481f78c1d26c83@condition-alpha.com>
 <83d024jxex.fsf@gnu.org>
 <e2bc26fa67e8c3bcc52fdb592cd662d2@condition-alpha.com>
 <83wo0agl6u.fsf@gnu.org>
 <1872097e3b35c576672cd126e26d6555@condition-alpha.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="31351"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 18:25:43 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kO1Op-00084h-Hc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:25:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kO1Oo-0003Fj-FH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:25:42 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39766)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kO1He-0002gs-MQ
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:18:18 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57042)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kO1He-0001jK-Aw; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:18:18 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4347 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kO1HU-0004VR-Be; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1872097e3b35c576672cd126e26d6555@condition-alpha.com> (message
 from Alexander Adolf on Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:13:50 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256877
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/256877>

> From: Alexander Adolf <alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com>
> Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:13:50 +0200
> 
> >From what I understood of your comments, you seem to claim that local
> users choosing different names in step #2 would cause a problem?

No.  The problem I have in mind is that the user might decide to give
a package some keyword when first installed, but then the user might
wish to have the same package in another setup-KEYWORD.el file as
well, because it is useful as part of another group of packages.