From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:14:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83im72lhh6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87tuqunw6q.fsf@telefonica.net> <835z3a5miu.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn1f2dlf.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87h7mn2122.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87mtwfyty6.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1973"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, matt@rfc20.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Whitton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 22:15:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Dt0-0000Pj-W2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:15:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43968 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9Dt0-00031K-0F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 16:15:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l98F3-0005DG-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:14:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l98F1-0007Hw-Te; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4914 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l98Eg-0003H1-A9; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 10:13:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtwfyty6.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> (message from Sean Whitton on Sun, 07 Feb 2021 23:06:25 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264177 Archived-At: > From: Sean Whitton > Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 23:06:25 -0700 > Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Which brings me to: if the point is to make certain kinds of bugs more > > discoverable, adding that feture to debbugs is another option. For > > example, if the bugs tagged "interface change" were interesting, debbugs > > could send updates for such bugs to an "interface change" mailing list > > that interested people could subscribe to. > > Well, you'd have to have debbugs mail the entire bug log to that mailing > list at the point at which it gets tagged, which seems a bit awkward. That shouldn't be necessary: we have Gnus and Rmail commands to download the entire bug DB as a series of folders, and thereafter the messages can be manipulated locally. See the debbugs package in ELPA.