From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about pgtk -- is it meant to fix the disconnect crash bug? Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 08:38:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83im66yujr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7lr4zrv.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: masm+emacs@masm11.me, emacs-devel@gnu.org, spwhitton@spwhitton.name To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 05 07:39:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI47w-00020D-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:39:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI47v-0006S7-Or for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 01:39:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI46f-00061C-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 01:38:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI46a-0003pC-Sr; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 01:38:34 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1240 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lI46a-0007np-C8; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 01:38:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from chad on Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:10:39 -0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266008 Archived-At: > From: chad > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:10:39 -0800 > Cc: Yuuki Harano , > EMACS development team > > I had thought that one of > the benefits of the pgtk branch was that it would not have this bug, > which plagues the old Emacs GTK builds. Am I just making that up? > > Adding a bit of historical perspective: it might be more accurate to say "the GTK people are unwilling to > address the issue when it's caused by what some people call 'unclean gtk use' inside emacs", with the > concomitant hope that they will more more receptive to a pure-gtk issue. Isn't the pgtk branch supposed to produce a "clean GTK use" inside Emacs? I thought that was its purpose.