From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tweaking the output of `C-h b' Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 14:29:42 +0200 Message-ID: <83ilxcm53d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lf29xdkf.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7cxx9bh.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgqpvtky.fsf@gnus.org> <87v91dvt6y.fsf@gnus.org> <87o874vhp2.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0hsvgvv.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 13:33:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhWUm-000ANE-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:33:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhWUk-0003Cd-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 08:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhWRz-0000v3-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 08:30:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhWRm-0002Gc-4h; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 08:29:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=K0cSfweEkp74QhJeT0BJdyfrfbhhuC9Hg87RgYAwLTc=; b=Kh1X1dWeY0k/ vBrMLWHNQY7G88OyDJQPjJieei8AsqdCiALiJKMxP64pqlNo0xxWQB8sF8hvOcwmHYkwR8+qI7m5R Yuvn8I/9WnSYGKU8aGjBuadJhOsRWClEt9D2ce1B600Kq8VzCzwvF31YHJmpEP3KovCetAId2cZEA HEBiV1o9rMeWZTd66ZNvW4hyzba/8OlJhSLULbAlDpgm4owgL03z32lWw7CxHAO26x6I3PFFcOlw6 V0jxMoVzUQrKV5WdXp7LND6cjAgXx7R2Zzx/HcSdQFvhR4Xk2ndcfV7AiJK494DRP0JVSG6fVio4x rFJT+fXICYfk/67vacO+7Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3201 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhWRi-0000Tf-3f; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 08:29:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:41:06 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278373 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:41:06 -0700 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > Is the "prefix command" thing vital to know? And should the ??'s be > > fixed? > > I don't think the "prefix command" is vital to know, as the commands > will be listed individually later. I say skip it. Incompatible behavior change alert!